Trevor L TaylorInsights
An empty park bench beside a path at dusk, illustrating a Trevor L Taylor podcast episode on rebuilding attraction after distance
Image: Scott Van Daalen scottvd, file page on Wikimedia Commons, CC0 1.0 Universal public domain dedication

When the Spark Fades, on Rebuilding Closeness

Hard Truths for a Soft World · episode 9 · 10 June 2026 · 3 cited sources

In this episode of Hard Truths for a Soft World, Trevor L Taylor takes on a painful situation: still loving a partner while no longer feeling drawn to them.

The episode treats this as one of the hardest and most misunderstood problems in long relationships. The host traces the loss of attraction to emotional distance, routine, conflict left unresolved and resentment that builds without being named. Leaning on research and clinical writing from Gottman, Perel and Aron, he explains why the first chemistry of romance naturally changes, how resentment wears down desire without announcing itself, and why smartphones often speed up the drift.

Resentment, in the telling of the host, accumulates through repeated missed moments of connection. Criticism, defensiveness and contempt make it worse, and so does phubbing, the habit of attending to a phone instead of a partner. Against these, the episode sets mystery, independence and emotional space as conditions for desire, along with turning toward a partner’s bids for attention and bringing novelty, curiosity and shared experiences back into the relationship. It closes with a plan for restoring trust, the tension of polarity and emotional closeness, and it presents the path as realistic and hopeful for couples who still want to try.

The idea of bids comes from the research of John Gottman, which The Atlantic described in detail. Partners make small requests for connection throughout the day, such as pointing out a bird in the yard. Couples who had divorced by a six year follow up had turned toward such bids 33 percent of the time, while couples who were still together had done so 87 percent of the time1.

Turning toward bids87 percentcouples still together after sixyears33 percentcouples divorced by the six yearfollow up
Share of bids for connection met with attention, from the research The Atlantic described. Source: The Atlantic.

The Gottman Institute defines a bid as any attempt by one partner to get attention, affirmation, affection or any other positive connection from the other, and notes that bids can be as simple as a smile or a wink2. The definition explains why the resentment the episode describes is so hard to see: each missed bid is small, and the damage lies in the accumulation.

The concern in the episode about phones also has support. A study in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health developed a measure of phubbing and found that people who are phubbed experience a sense of social exclusion. That exclusion was associated with more social media use, which in turn was associated with higher anxiety and depression3. In the terms of the episode, a phone that pulls attention away at the moment of a bid is a missed turn toward a partner, and a quiet push toward the screen for the person left waiting.

Those numbers make the advice in the episode concrete. Rebuilding attraction starts with noticing the small requests that distance taught a couple to ignore, and answering them on purpose until answering becomes habit again.

Listen to the original episode on Podbean, published 10 June 2026

References

  1. The Atlantic. Masters of Love, June 2014.
  2. The Gottman Institute. Turn Towards Instead of Away, April 2015.
  3. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (via PubMed Central). Developing and Testing a Scale Designed to Measure Perceived Phubbing, November 2020.

External links

See also